Home    Course Outline    Contact Instructor    Library    Catalog     Translate
This material is for training purposes only. Its purpose is to inform employers and employees of best practices in occupational safety and health and general OSHA compliance requirements. This material is not a substitute for any provision of the Occupational Safety and Health Act or any standards issued by OSHA.

MODULE THREE: CORRECTING SAFETY HAZARDS

Introduction

In the last module, we examined the inspection and JHA processes to identify hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors in the workplace. Once hazards have been identified, it's important that they be corrected in a timely manner. Even more importantly, the underlying safety management system weaknesses must be improved to make sure they do not produce the identified hazards in the future. In this module, we'll examine the hazard controls strategies used to correct identified hazards, and we'll discuss the safety management system improvement process.

Once hazardous conditions or unsafe work practices are identified, it's important that the supervisor makes sure they are eliminated or reduced as soon as possible. To do this, one or a combination of the following three hazard control strategies should be used.

The Hierarchy of Hazard Control Strategies

Engineering Controls. These strategies are considered first because they have the potential of completely eliminate the hazard, thus greatly reducing the probability of an accident. Redesigning or replacing equipment or machinery may be expensive, but remember that, according to the National Safety Council, the average direct and indirect cost of a lost work time injury is $34,000 and $1,115,000 to close a fatality claim.

When considering engineering controls, you should think about the feasibility, costs, and ease of implementation of replacing or redesigning the equipment. OSHA will expect your employer to consider this control strategy before employing the other strategies.

Work Practice controls. These control strategies attempt to reduce exposure to a hazard by primarily changing the way work is accomplished. Work procedures and practice are revised somehow. An important principle to remember is that this control strategy works only as long as people behave: that's "iffy" at best in the long term.

Administrative Controls. Like work practice controls, these control strategies attempt to reduce or eliminate exposure to the hazard. The strategy differs in that exposure is limited by revising:

  • The frequency of exposure to the hazard.
  • The duration of the task that exposes the employee to the hazard.
  • The number of employees exposed to the hazard.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Sometimes it is impossible to eliminate a hazard through engineering, work practice, and/or administrative controls. In these situations, personal protective equipment may be required to provide some degree of safety by placing a barrier between the employee and the hazard. For this reason, using personal protective equipment should be the strategy of last resort.

What's the solution?

Let's assume you are the supervisor of a warehouse. Your five employees must lift and carry 85 pound sacks of grain repeatedly to a pallet during their eight-hour work shift. How can you reduce or eliminate the possibility of an injury from carrying the heavy bags? Let's take a look at a few examples:

  • Engineering Controls. Reduce the weight of the bags. Devise a conveyor belt system that eliminates the need to carry the bags.
  • Work Practice Control. Train and require each employee to use proper lifting procedures.
  • Administrative Control. Change the procedure so that two employees are required to carry a bag.
  • Personal Protective Equipment. Can't use the body belt... it doesn't protect anyone. I don't know what you could use. Do you?
Improving safety management systems

Any organizational safety system may be less than "healthful" for any number of reasons. It is important to implement an effective system wellness plan to make sure the “prognosis” for all safety management systems within an organization remains positive. That is what evaluation process is all about...wellness. Safety coordinators, safety committees and other support staff can be very effective in evaluating programs to uncover those inadequate or missing safety management system components that are producing the hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors you, as the supervisor, have identified.

Although you may not get directly involved in the safety management system evaluation program, you and your employees are critical in forwarding quality information so that the evaluation process is successful. To help you do this, think of the conditions and behaviors you identify as symptoms that point to underlying causes. You may identify symptoms that point to special or personal weaknesses, or you may uncover symptoms pointing directly to underlying system or program weaknesses.

Symptoms - Observable/Measurable indicators. What do we see?

Symptoms indicating personal weaknesses.
  • A unique hazardous condition or unsafe/inappropriate behavior performed by one person.
  • May occur at any level of the organization.
  • May indicate a “special” problem that requires a unique solution.
  • Attributing error to personal weakness should never be the initial assumption.

Symptoms indicating system weaknesses.

  • A number of similar conditions or behaviors common to a number of locations.
  • May occur at any level of the organization.
  • May contribute to, or produce a specific hazardous condition and unsafe behavior.
  • Indicates a “common” problem that requires a system solution.
  • The scope of the condition or behavior indicates the management level at which the cause exists.
  • Attributing error to system weaknesses should usually be the initial assumption.

Now that we have observable and measurable conditions and behaviors, you or safety professionals need to continue the evaluation process by assessing and analyzing their underlying systems causes.

Causes - What do the symptoms tell you?

Causes indicating weaknesses in organizational structure
  • Formulated by upper management.
  • Inadequate design of vision, mission, strategies, objectives
  • Inadequate design of policies, plans, processes, programs, procedures.
  • May exist in any program in any department
  • The natural result of a non-supportive leadership style.

Causes indicating weaknesses in leadership style

  • Non-supporting corporate vision.
  • Unreasonable expectations of the CEO or Owner.
  • External forces: stakeholders, materials, industry, community, society, government.
  • The natural result of a inappropriate values creating a fear-based culture.

Last words...

Identifying hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors is only a part of the equation in effective supervision. Controlling those hazards and making sure that the safety system weaknesses that produced them are improved, is are critical activities. Sound management and leadership practices requires a supervisor to pay close attention to the follow-through of top management as well as specific employee behaviors.

Take the Review Quiz
Copyright © 2000-2008 Geigle Communications, LLC. All rights reserved. Federal copyright law prohibits unauthorized reproduction by any means and imposes fines up to $25,000 for violations. Students may reproduce materials for personal study. Comment