Commitment to Ergonomics
Fred A. Manuele, author of On the Practice of Safety, considers occupational ergonomics to be "the art and science of designing the work to fit the worker to achieve optimum productivity and cost efficiency, and minimum risk of injury." To best fulfill the goal to achieve these benefits through ergonomics, a sound program should be developed: A program that includes a written plan, education and training, and effective procedures to identify, analyze and evaluate work for ergonomic risk factors.
As with other workplace safety and health issues, managers and employees both play
key roles in setting the stage: developing and carrying out an ergonomics program. It's important that management understand the benefits of an effective ergonomics program.
Ergonomics as part of a company safety and health program
Ergonomics programs should not be regarded as separate from those intended to address other workplace hazards. Aspects of hazard identification, case documentation, assessment of control options, and health care management techniques that are used to address ergonomic problems use the same approaches directed toward other workplace risks of injury or disease. Although many of the technical approaches described in this course are specific to ergonomic risk factors and MSDs, the core principles are the same as efforts to control other workplace hazards.
Reactive vs. Proactive Approaches
Proactive ergonomics activities emphasize efforts at the design stage of work processes to recognize needs for avoiding risk factors that can lead to musculoskeletal problems. The goal is to design operations that ensure proper selection and use of tools, job methods, workstation layouts, and materials that impose no undue stress and strain on the worker.
Essential Considerations
Ergonomics issues are identified and resolved in the planning process. In addition,
general ergonomic knowledge, learned from an ongoing ergonomics program, can be
used to build a more prevention-oriented approach.
Management commitment and
employee involvement in the planning activity are essential. For example, management
can set policy to require ergonomic considerations for any equipment to be purchased,
and production employees can offer ideas on the basis of their past experiences for
alleviating potential problems.
Planners of new work processes involved in the design
of job tasks, equipment, and workplace layout, must become more aware of ergonomic
factors and principles. Designers must have appropriate information and guidelines
about risk factors for MSDs and ways to control them. Studying past designs of jobs
in terms of risk factors can offer useful input into their design strategies.
If you don't know the answer to this question, take a look at this additional information.
Expressions of Management Mommitment
Management commitment is a key and perhaps the most important controlling factor in determining whether any worksite hazard control effort will be successful. Management
commitment can be expressed in a variety of ways. Lessons learned from NIOSH case
studies of ergonomic hazard control efforts in the meatpacking industry emphasize the following points regarding evidence of effective management commitment:
Policy statements are issued that:
- treat ergonomic efforts as furthering the company's strategic goals,
- expect full cooperation of the total workforce in working together toward realizing ergonomic improvements,
- assign lead roles to designated persons who are known to "make things happen,"
- give ergonomic efforts priority with other cost reduction, productivity, and quality assurance activities, and
- have the support of the local union or other worker representatives.
- allow full discussion of the policy and the plans for implementation.
- set concrete goals that address specific operations and give priority to the jobs posing the greatest risk.
Resources are committed to:
- train the workforce to be more aware of ergonomic risk factors for MSDs,
- Provide detailed instruction to those expected to assume lead roles or serve on
special groups to handle various tasks,
- bring in outside experts for consultations about start-up activities and difficult
issues at least until in-house expertise can be developed, and
- implement ergonomic improvements as may be indicated.
- provide release time or other compensatory arrangements during the workday for
employees expected to handle assigned tasks dealing with ergonomic concerns.
It's important to furnish information to all those involved in or affected by the ergonomic activities. Misinformation or misperceptions about such efforts can be
damaging: If management is seen as using the program to gain ideas for cutting costs or
improving productivity without equal regard for employee benefits, the program may
not be supported by employees. For example, management should be up-front
regarding possible impacts of the program on job security and job changes. All injury
data, production information, and cost considerations need to be made available to
those expected to make feasible recommendations for solving problems.
 |
Employee involvement Promoting employee involvement in efforts to improve workplace ergonomic conditions has several
benefits. They include
- enhanced worker motivation and job satisfaction,
- added problem-solving capabilities,
- greater acceptance of change, and
- greater knowledge of the work and organization.
|
Worker involvement in safety and health issues means obtaining worker input on
several issues.
- The first input is defining real or suspected job hazards.
- Another is suggesting ways to control suspected hazards.
- A third involves working with management in deciding how best to put controls into place.
Employee participation in an organization's efforts to reduce work-related injury or
disease and ergonomic problems may take the form of direct
or individual input. A common involvement process is participation
through a joint labor-management safety and health committee, which may be
company-wide or department-wide in nature. Membership on company-wide
committees includes union leaders or elected worker representatives, department heads,
and key figures from various areas of the organization.
Two factors are critical to the different
forms of worker involvement. One is the need for training both in hazard recognition
and control and in group problem solving. The second is that management must share
information and knowledge of results with those involved.
No single form or level of worker involvement fits all situations or meets all needs.
Much depends on the nature of the problems to be addressed, the skills and abilities of
those involved, and the company's prevailing practices for participative approaches in
resolving workplace issues.
Who should participate?
Ergonomic problems typically require a response that cuts across a number of
organizational units. Hazard identification through job task analyses and review of
injury records or symptom surveys, as well as the development and implementation of
control measures, can require input from
- safety and hygiene personnel,
- health care providers,
- human resource personnel,
- engineering personnel,
- maintenance personnel, and
- ergonomics specialists.
In addition, worker and management representatives are considered essential players in
any ergonomics program effort.
In small businesses, two or more of the functions noted on this list may be merged into
one unit, or one person may handle several of the listed duties. Regardless of the size
of the organization, persons identified with these responsibilities are crucial to an
ergonomics program. Purchasing personnel in particular should be included, since the
issues raised can dictate new or revised specifications on new equipment orders.
How best to fit these different players into the program could depend on the company's
existing occupational safety and health program practices. Integrating ergonomics into
the company's current occupational safety and health activities while giving it special
emphasis may have the most appeal.
Exercise 3: Discuss how employees are, or could be involved in identifying and addressing ergonomics issues in your workplace.
Conclusion
Taking a proactive approach to ergonomics is so important to the success of the program. Maximizing employee involvement is one of the keys to a successful proactive ergonomics program. When employees identify and help devise solutions, they gain a degree of ownership. We value what we own. Ownership increases the probability that "EC" (ergonomically correct ;-) behaviors are performed when employees are not being directly supervised.
Source: OSHA
|
Copyright © 2000-2008 Geigle Communications. All rights reserved. Federal copyright law prohibits unauthorized reproduction by any means and imposes fines up to $25,000 for violations.
|
|