It's more important now than ever to identify workplace hazards because fatality rates continue to increase. There were a total of 5,190 fatal work injuries recorded in the United States in 2016, a 7-percent increase from the 4,836 fatal injuries reported in 2015, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported. This is the first time more than 5,000 fatalities have been recorded since 2008. The fatal injury rate increased to 3.6 per 100,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) workers from 3.4 in 2015, the highest rate since 2010.
In this module, we'll discuss the five areas within which all workplace hazards exist. We'll also cover two important proactive hazard identification processes: the safety inspection and job hazard analysis (JHA). Finally, we'll look at the incident and accident investigation process and how it can effectively identify and help to eliminate hazards.
To help identify workplace hazards, it's useful to categorize them into easy-to-remember categories. The first three categories represent hazardous conditions. According to SAIF Corporation, a major workers compensation insurer in Oregon, conditions directly account for only 3% of all workplace accidents. The fourth category describes employee behaviors in the workplace that may contribute or cause as much as 95% of all workplace accidents. All five categories represent the surface symptoms of underlying root causes or safety management system weaknesses. Take a look at the accident weed to get a better idea about the relationship between surface symptoms and root causes for accidents.
To remember the five hazard areas, don't forget the acronym, MEEPS:
Let's review these five categories:
Materials: liquids, solids and gases that can be hazardous to employees.
Equipment: machinery and tools used to produce or process goods.
Environment: general area that employees are working in.
People: employees, management and others in the workplace.
System: the processes and rules put into place to manage safety, also known as the safety management system.
As a supervisor, you have four excellent tools that will help you identify and correct hazards:
In effective safety cultures, a Safety Observation Program is developed and maintained. Managers, supervisors and safety committees are educated on how to conduct informal and formal safety observations.
Safety observation program education includes:
Important safety leadership messages are sent to employees when the supervisor observes, informs, and recognizes employees on the spot during random walkaround observations. One important message given employees is that the supervisor considers the safety of each employee as a core value. To be successful, observation programs should include a policy the ensures employees who are being observed are not subject to discipline.
The most common hazard identification procedure is the walkaround safety inspection. To be most effective, it makes sense that the safety inspection responsibility be delegated to the supervisor because, as an agent of the employer, the basic responsibility to detect and correct hazard in the work area rests with the supervisor. Important points to remember about conducting walkaround inspections include:
Check out this short audio clip by Dan Clark of the theSafetyBrief.com. Dan has compiled the 10 most common signage and labeling questions asked about keeping workers safe and avoiding fines. These questions are from a wide range of industries.
It's an effective method to use checklists when conducting safety inspections. Here is a five-step process you can use to develop an effective checklist.
Step One: Determine the work area to be inspected, and the type of work being accomplished.
Step Two: Talk with the safety director, workers' compensation insurer, or OSHA consultant to determine the safety rules that apply to the work area.
Step Three: Ask employees who work in the area for recommended checklist questions.
Step Four: Select the rules that you believe directly apply to your work area.
Step Five: Finally, change each selected rule into a checklist question. Be sure to state the question as concisely as possible.
The result of following these procedures is to build a checklist that closely mirrors those hazards that OSHA will be inspecting. It might be a good idea to use an expert resource, such as those listed in Step Two, to evaluate the checklist you have developed.
As a supervisor, you probably don't want to be the only person inspecting for safety in your work area. You can, of course, delegate that responsibility to your workers. But how do you get them to willingly inspect for safety every day? Simple: You set the example yourself by inspecting regularly, requiring employees to inspect, and recognizing your workers for inspecting and reporting hazards.
Another effective activity to ensure a safe and healthful workplace is the Job Hazard Analysis (JHA). This process is also called a Job Safety Analysis (JSA) In the JHA process, you and your employee together analyze each step of a particular task and come up with ways to make it safer. The JHA goes far beyond the walkaround inspection in its ability to eliminate or reduce most causes for accidents in the workplace.
The Problem: Unfortunately, the walkaround inspection is usually just an assessment. It merely attempts to determine if a hazard is present or not. It's conducted by one or two persons who walk around looking high and low to uncover hazardous conditions (I call this the "rolling eyeball syndrome"). If properly trained, they may effectively uncover hazards. If properly trained they may know how to effectively question employees during the inspection (they ask questions other than "any safety complaints?"). I think the most serious weakness inherent in the safety inspection process is that very little time is devoted to analyzing any one particular work area.
The fix: The Job Hazard Analysis is not plagued with all these problems. It goes beyond mere assessment by truly analyzing the conditions and practices related to one specific task. When completing the JHA, you must:
Take a look at a simple JHA worksheet that you can adapt for your workplace.
The chief advantage is that adequate time is given to analysis of both hazardous conditions and unsafe work practices. Consequently, it may be possible to eliminate or reduce all of the causes for a potential accident. This advantage makes the JHA far more useful and beneficial in preventing accidents in the workplace. Although the occupational safety and health rules do not specifically require JHAs be accomplished on all hazardous tasks, we strongly recommend a formal JHA program conducted jointly by supervisors and employees. It makes good business sense.
Both the safety inspection and the JHA can be quite effective proactive safety processes to identify hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors in the workplace. However, effective accident investigations are both reactive and proactive.
Check out the video to the right to learn more about the "Action Steps" in the incident/accident investigation process.
Make sure employees report near-misses. It's a proven fact that investigating near-miss incidents is effective for a number of reasons.
Investigating incidents is always less expensive than investigating accidents. They have to be, because an injury or illness has not occurred. Even a minor incident is important to investigate because, what might be today's cut finger, could be tomorrow's amputated finger. It's that simple.
Accident investigation - Safety triage Accident investigations that occur after someone is injured remain very important to your company's safety and health management system if the primary purpose is to uncover root causes. If accident investigations occur only to place blame, they are basically a waste of time and will harm the safety management system in the long term.
Accident investigation is a seven-step process with the ultimate for conducting accident investigations.
When conducting an incident/accident investigation, it is critical to uncover the underlying root causes for the event. An incident or accident may be the result of many factors that have interacted in some dynamic way. When conducting an incident/accident investigation, be sure to include each of the following levels of analysis to make sure you uncover the root causes:
Injury analysis - How did the injury occur? At this level of analysis, we focus on trying to determine the direct cause of the injury that may or did occur. Examples of the direct causes of injury include:
Surface Cause Analysis - Why did the accident occur? Here you determine the unique hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors that interact to produce the accident. Each of the hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors uncovered are the surface causes for the accident. They give clues that point to possible root causes/system weaknesses. Examples of surface causes include:
Root cause analysis - Why did the surface causes occur? At this level, you're analyzing the weaknesses in the safety management system that contributed to the accident such as missing or inadequate safety policies, programs, plans, processes, or procedures. This level of investigation is also called "common cause" analysis (in quality terms) because you're identifying a system component that may contribute to common conditions and behaviors that exist or occur throughout the company. Examples of root causes include:
Click on the "Check Quiz Answers" button to grade your quiz and see your score. You will receive a message if you forgot to answer one of the questions. After clicking the button, the questions you missed will be listed below. You can correct any missed questions and recheck your answers.