Since 1970, workplace fatalities have been reduced by half. Occupational injury and illness rates have been declining for the past six years, dropping in 1998 to the lowest level on record. But there is much more to do. Nearly 50 American workers are injured every minute of the 40-hour work week and almost 17 die each day. Federal and state OSHA programs have only about 2,500 inspectors to cover 100 million workers at six million worksites. Workers must play an active role in spotting workplace hazards and asking their employers to correct them.
In this module, we'll take a look at the five areas within which all workplace hazards exist. Additionally, we'll discuss the inspection and job hazard analysis processes that are two important proactive hazard identification processes. Finally, we'll examine the incident and accident investigation process and how it can effectively identify and help to eliminate hazards.
To help identify workplace hazards, it's useful to categorize them into easy-to-remember categories. The first three categories represent hazardous conditions. According to SAIF Corporation, a major workers compensation insurer in Oregon, conditions directly account for only 3% of all workplace accidents. The fourth category describes employee behaviors in the workplace that may contribute or cause as much as 95% of all workplace accidents. All five categories represent the surface symptoms of underlying root causes or safety management system weaknesses. Take a look at the accident weed to get a better idea about the relationship between surface symptoms and root causes for accidents.
To remember the five hazard areas, don't forget the acronym, MEEPS:
Let's review these five categories:
Materials: liquids, solids and gases that can be hazardous to employees.
Equipment: machinery and tools used to produce or process goods.
Environment: general area that employees are working in.
People: employees, management and others in the workplace.
System: the processes and rules put into place to manage safety, also known as the safety management system.
As a supervisor, you have some tools that will help you identify and correct hazards in the five MEEP areas discussed in the previous tab.
One important activity to ensure a safe work area is to conduct an effective walkaround safety inspection. If your organization relies solely on the safety committee to identify workplace hazards, it's possible the process may be ineffective. The job of maintaining a safe and healthful work area is a primary OSHA-mandated employer responsibility, so, to be most effective, it makes sense that the safety inspection responsibility be delegated to the supervisor. Who is better positioned to effectively identify and correct workplace hazards? Remember, as an agent of the employer, the basic responsibility to inspect the work area may rest with the supervisor.
As you conduct the inspection, you should be looking at the hazards associated with the five MEEPS categories discussed earlier (materials, equipment, environment, people, and systems). In some instances, using an inspection checklist may be a good idea to make sure a systematic procedure is used. The only downside that can surface from using a checklist regards the "tunnel vision" syndrome: hazards not addressed on the checklist may be overlooked.
Check out this short audio clip by Dan Clark of the theSafetyBrief.com. Dan has compiled the 10 most common signage and labeling questions asked about keeping workers safe and avoiding fines. These questions are from a wide range of industries.
Most companies conduct safety inspections in compliance with OSHA rule requirements. But, is that good enough? Safety inspections may be effective, but only if those conducting the inspection are properly educated and trained in hazard identification and control concepts and principles specific to the company. It takes more to keep the workplace safe from hazards in industries that see change on a daily basis.
Employees should inspect the materials, equipment, and tools they use, and their immediate workstation for hazardous conditions at the start of each workday. They should inspect equipment such as forklifts, trucks, and other vehicles before using them at the start of each shift. It's better to inspect closely and often and give the process enough time. One of the major weaknesses in the inspection process is that we just don't spend enough time in particular areas to detect all hazards. Again, we do the "rolling eyeball" as we walk through an area.
Step One: Determine the work area to be inspected, and the type of work being accomplished.
Step Two: Talk with the safety director, workers' compensation insurer, or OSHA consultant to determine what safety rules apply to the work area. Obtain copies of the rules.
Step Three: Select the rules that you feel directly apply to your work area. Many rules may not have significant impact on the work area you are responsible for.
Step Four: Change each selected rule into a checklist question. Be sure to state the question as concisely as possible.
Step Five: Ask employees who work in the area for recommended checklist questions.
The result of following these procedures is to build a checklist that closely mirrors those hazards that OSHA will be inspecting. It might be a good idea to use an expert resource, such as those listed in Step Two, to evaluate the checklist you have developed.
As a supervisor, you probably don't want to be the only person inspecting for safety in your work area. You can, of course, delegate that responsibility to your workers. But how do you get them to willingly inspect for safety every day? Simple, (that's right, it doesn't have to be difficult) you set the example yourself by inspecting regularly, you insist that they inspect, and you recognize (thank) your workers for inspecting and reporting hazards.
Another effective activity to ensure a safe and healthful workplace is the Job Hazard Analysis (JHA). This process is also called a Job Safety Analysis (JSA) In the JHA process, you and your employee together analyze each step of a particular task and come up with ways to make it safer. The JHA goes far beyond the walkaround inspection in its ability to eliminate or reduce most causes for accidents in the workplace.
The Problem: Unfortunately, the walkaround inspection is usually just an assessment. It merely attempts to determine if a hazard is present or not. It's conducted by one or two persons who walk around looking high and low to uncover hazardous conditions (I call this the "rolling eyeball syndrome"). If properly trained, they may effectively uncover hazards. If properly trained they may know how to effectively question employees during the inspection (they ask questions other than "any safety complaints?"). I think the most serious weakness inherent in the safety inspection process is that very little time is devoted to analyzing any one particular work area.
The fix: The Job Hazard Analysis is not plagued with all these problems. It goes beyond mere assessment by truly analyzing the conditions and practices related to one specific task. When completing the JHA, you must:
Take a look at a simple JHA worksheet that you can adapt for your workplace.
The chief advantage is that adequate time is given to analysis of both hazardous conditions and unsafe work practices. Consequently, it may be possible to eliminate or reduce all of the causes for a potential accident. This advantage makes the JHA far more useful and beneficial in preventing accidents in the workplace. Although the occupational safety and health rules do not specifically require JHA's be accomplished on all hazardous tasks, we strongly recommend a formal JHA program conducted jointly by supervisors and employees. It makes good business sense.
Both the safety inspection and the JHA can be quite effective proactive safety processes to identify hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors in the workplace. Although incident and accident investigation occur after the fact (the near-hit or injury) and may be technically categorized as being "reactive" strategies, they may be quite "proactive" in identifying hazards and preventing future injuries. Let's take a look at these two processes.
Incident/Accident Investigations - The "Odds of Injury"
Research studies have determined that for every 600 incidents in the workplace, about 30 will result in minor injury, 10 in serious injury and one in death. The problem is: you don't know which of the 600 incidents will result in a serious injury or fatality.
If someone offered you a jar full of jelly beans, and told you that one of the jelly beans was laced with cyanide, would you eat one? I don't think so.
If you were told by your airline that one out of 600 flights crashed, would you fly with them? Probably not. Yet, in the workplace, we don't think about the odds of injury.
It's a proven fact that investigating incidents or near-misses is extremely effective for a number of reasons. As a supervisor who understands your safety responsibilities, you know how important it is for employees to report near misses and minor injuries immediately. But, what are the benefits to your employees and the company from doing so?
Always fewer injuries and less expensive: Investigating incidents is always less expensive than accident investigations. They have to be...because an injury or illness has not occurred. Even a minor incident is important to investigate because, what might be today's cut finger, could be tomorrow's amputated finger. If you investigate and eliminate the hazard that caused the cut finger today, you eliminate the possibility for the amputated finger tomorrow. It's that simple. There are stories of company's who continually suffer from the direct and indirect consequences resulting from the same injuries over and over, yet fail to do anything about the causes. Do you think these companies are going to be successful in an increasingly competitive world market? I don't think so.
Accident investigation - Safety triage Although accident investigations are considered primarily a "reactive" safety program because they are conducted only after an accident has occurred, they remain very important to your company's injury and illness prevention program. If the only purpose of the investigation is to place blame, they are totally reactive and ineffective. If, however, the purpose is to uncover the underlying system weaknesses that allowed the conditions and practices to exist, they may become a suitable proactive tool.
Trent, a new employee in the maintenance department, was told to remove a jammed conveyor belt. At the conveyor belt, he discovered that a wad of plastic had become tangled in a belt. As soon as he removed the plastic, the conveyor started up. Unfortunately, Trent's hand got caught in an incoming nip point and was severely injured.
It might be relatively easy to determine what the surface causes for the accident in this scenario are, but what might be the most likely root cause(s)? Root causes are the missing or inadequate programs, policies, plans, processes or procedures that produced the hazardous conditions and unsafe behaviors described in the scenario above.
Before beginning this quiz, we highly recommend you review the module material. This quiz is designed to allow you to self-check your comprehension of the module content, but only focuses on key concepts and ideas.
Read each question carefully. Select the best answer, even if more than one answer seems possible. When done, click on the "Get Quiz Answers" button. If you do not answer all the questions, you will receive an error message.